Ad enquiry
CTV interview - the dollar and the Budget http://t.co/TTrNMa8K
15/05/2012 3:00 p.m.
The Economist | Free exchange: Hope springs a trap http://t.co/SSkpdqEH via @theeconomist
13/05/2012 10:11 p.m.
The Economist | Buttonwood: The question of extractive elites http://t.co/IyRLPDBN via @theeconomist
13/05/2012 10:10 p.m.
The Economist | Buttonwood: Feeling peaky http://t.co/ku6D35hz via @theeconomist
13/05/2012 10:09 p.m.
Print-friendly
16
DEC 09

Ever wondered why?


3 comment(s)

A story as old as New Zealand politics, capital gains tax a near death experience in New Zealand. A New Zealand that desires so much to show the world how to do things properly, gst and no exceptions, have a care for the WTO rules, be an exemplary international citizen to the detriment of local interests even. But when it comes to a blanced tax, when it comes to doing something every other jurisdiction does CGT just gets too hard.

Only when you understand that whilst only 5% of the population at large have second properties close to 60% of our MPs hold more than the family home. Does that answer the question.

I was at a meeting recently and some there commented he had heard a comment that a change might be desirable but it would never happen, as it would influence that individuals tax paid. Wishful thinking, maybe, but the individual was high up in the IRD. I do not know what the incidence of second house ownership is in the top levels of the civil service but I suspect it is much higher than the 5% in the general population.

Maybe someone can correct me?
 


Grumpy Old Man - 15 December 2009 at 19:41 p.m.
Look past self interest - a cold day in hell first.
Christov - 26 February 2010 at 9:54 a.m.
It would be political suicide at least for that term. In order to get real taxation and social welfare reform... the Political ideaology of social welfare would need to be in step with it's largest contributors and so tax reformation would come as a consequence of that action.

To achieve this end would take a Govt. who accepts the risk of not being returned but creates policy reforms that are unlikley to be overturned.

Simplified.. both(major) parties know what is in the best interests of the Nation as a whole...neither wants to execute thier duty in respect to that interest.
John Walley - 27 February 2010 at 16:44 p.m.
@Christov - sad but true, who will put the future before self?

Name:
Email:
Website URL:
Comment:
Remember Me:
Email Replies: