RT @Adherium: In the latest @atscommunity report, #asthma costs the US economy more than $80bn annually in medical expenses, missed work an…
17/01/2018 8:06 PM
RT @MkBlyth: Interview on WBUR (Boston) with Chris Lydon @radioopensource last night. Chris is the guy that gave me my radio voice a decade…
7/01/2018 12:45 PM
RT @Valuetrap13: There is a simple reason corporations are not investing as much. It's the right hand scale. Macroprudential policy based…
7/01/2018 12:32 PM
RT @Adherium: Sharp rise in #mHealth app usage - health condition management apps now account for 40% of all health-related apps https://t…
7/01/2018 12:32 PM
RT @Phil_Free_: “So you’re telling us that selling each other overpriced houses backed by a banking system that has a bonus structure based…
7/01/2018 12:10 PM
RT @cioadvisorapac: Adherium: Smart Medication with Smart inhaler https://t.co/GlhHuPXXmC #medtech #healthcare https://t.co/GlhHuPXXmC
4/01/2018 6:29 PM
RT @INETeconomics: "every dollar a worker earns in a research field spills over to make the economy $5 better off. Every dollar a similar w…
4/01/2018 6:29 PM
RT @PositiveMoneyUK: Positive Money has been campaigning for digital currency to be used to allow people to keep their money with the Bank…
3/01/2018 9:39 PM
RT @bryankav123: @JoshBBornstein @MikeSeccombe Yep. And here's how his cap gains discount started the Australian real estate speculative bu…
24/12/2017 3:32 PM
RT @Adherium: Milestones Achieved in Advance of 2018 https://t.co/bRZ5Vix7am #digitalhealth @digitaltherapeutics #mhealth #healthtech #smar…
22/12/2017 10:04 AM
Recent Post Comments
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.

NOV 13

An interesting thread - Supply chain conflicts

As part of the thinking for my presentation at the WPA/PMA/FTMA conference I did a bit of background checking, where the below thread went was illuminating and supports my other post “Milk powder, logs and China”. Following is my conversation with Professor Göran Roos


I am in conversation with a number of wood processors in NZ, they have a problem that they can’t add sufficient value to the processed logs to pay the forest owners price for the logs as China will take all it can for packing. Most of the forest owners are not resident in NZ (institutional owners) the forest maintenance is continually being cut so production is only really fit for packaging – structural and appearance grade timber is increasingly hard to get as short term decisions of owners are forcing long term outcomes on everyone.

This must have been an issue in Scandinavia – individual interests in supply chains threatening the interest of others in the supply chain and reducing overall value add to the raw material – was there a Scandinavian solution? If so can you point me at the literature?



This has not really been an issue in Scandinavia since, firstly the ownership is mainly private with one exception, secondly the value adding is substantially higher in Scandinavia and hence the prices paid are and have been better. Green triangle stakeholders in the big study made if you are interested.



So Scandinavia never faced the problem where forest owners could get higher prices offshore than with local processors? We're the forest owners also local as opposed to offshore? Did you never encounter supply chain conflicts of this sort?


No, this has never been a problem. The local large paper and pulp and timber players are fighting each other for access to the raw material so exporting it has never really been an option outside very special niche products.


tags: goran roos, exports, china, scandinavia, supply chain, adding value
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.