RT @Adherium: We are excited to announce that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted our 510(k) clearance for over-the-cou…
3/04/2018 1:56 PM
The Economist | Moral hazard https://t.co/GU02RCk5VA via @TheEconomist
28/02/2018 7:09 AM
RT @ftcompanies: Corporate moves to cut ties with NRA do not go far enough https://t.co/CjwL5x8NhS
26/02/2018 8:14 AM
RT @KateRaworth: Let's get personal. Here's my life - along with my mum's, my kids and their kids - mapped out on a climate timeline. Bring…
26/02/2018 8:13 AM
RT @natehoIe: Companies that cut ties w/ the NRA: Delta United Airlines SimpliSafe Teladoc Wyndham Hotels MetLife Symantec Enterprise Alam…
25/02/2018 6:56 PM
RT @bernardchickey: Real question for RBNZ is why isn't it cutting rates? Core inflation below 2% target for 6 years. Jobs growing strongly…
9/02/2018 8:34 AM
RT @MkBlyth: Thought for the day: Let's say rising wages cause inflation panic cause equity crash. So we have built a system where stabilit…
9/02/2018 8:23 AM
RT @MkBlyth: Oic of the day. HT to @DougHenwood for nailing this. Not only is a 2.4% annual growth in wages unlikely to start an inflationa…
9/02/2018 8:22 AM
RT @Adherium: CEO @arik_anderson featured in @beckershr - Rule No. 1 for medical technology: Stay out of the doctor’s way https://t.co/d5FP…
1/02/2018 5:10 PM
RT @MkBlyth: Picture of the day from Llewellyn Consulting. Gross World Product went from 18 to 77 trillion since 1980. Massive Growth. Wher…
1/02/2018 5:10 PM
Recent Post Comments
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.

Print-friendly
7
NOV 13

An interesting thread - Supply chain conflicts




As part of the thinking for my presentation at the WPA/PMA/FTMA conference I did a bit of background checking, where the below thread went was illuminating and supports my other post “Milk powder, logs and China”. Following is my conversation with Professor Göran Roos


---------------

I am in conversation with a number of wood processors in NZ, they have a problem that they can’t add sufficient value to the processed logs to pay the forest owners price for the logs as China will take all it can for packing. Most of the forest owners are not resident in NZ (institutional owners) the forest maintenance is continually being cut so production is only really fit for packaging – structural and appearance grade timber is increasingly hard to get as short term decisions of owners are forcing long term outcomes on everyone.

This must have been an issue in Scandinavia – individual interests in supply chains threatening the interest of others in the supply chain and reducing overall value add to the raw material – was there a Scandinavian solution? If so can you point me at the literature?

John

-----------------

This has not really been an issue in Scandinavia since, firstly the ownership is mainly private with one exception, secondly the value adding is substantially higher in Scandinavia and hence the prices paid are and have been better. Green triangle stakeholders in the big study made if you are interested.

Göran

--------------

So Scandinavia never faced the problem where forest owners could get higher prices offshore than with local processors? We're the forest owners also local as opposed to offshore? Did you never encounter supply chain conflicts of this sort?

John
------------

No, this has never been a problem. The local large paper and pulp and timber players are fighting each other for access to the raw material so exporting it has never really been an option outside very special niche products.

Göran
   


tags: goran roos, exports, china, scandinavia, supply chain, adding value
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.