https://t.co/tlXsLXZarK
26/06/2017 9:21 PM
RT @rethinkecon: 'Going Beyond Exchange' from @TheMinskys @HeskevanDoornen https://t.co/GVNeY8gyIQ
23/06/2017 8:53 PM
RT @ChrisGiles_: Hard or soft Brexit? The six scenarios for Britain https://t.co/Fk2hj8muah via @FT
23/06/2017 8:52 PM
This is worth a read: https://t.co/gjARfKQ6JB
20/06/2017 9:58 PM
RT @PositiveMoneyUK: ...and it’s almost impossible to reduce our debts without causing a recession - Welcome to the debt trap! https://t.co…
20/06/2017 9:49 PM
@Parker_Banking The pirates are in the accendency - on the pirate scale there is no difference between Trump and Pu… https://t.co/XbxmE9OJao
17/06/2017 1:11 PM
RT @PositiveMoneyUK: Why are House Prices So High? https://t.co/kYNWqTc6kP
16/06/2017 3:57 PM
@Omearanz Tax incentives point away from productive investments - asset price inflation is not productive of itself… https://t.co/zOCXPEj93U
15/06/2017 5:00 PM
@Parker_Banking People without income and assets cannot be consumers - superfluous to economy - superfluous to soci… https://t.co/EHIOqdcNXH
15/06/2017 12:18 PM
@Parker_Banking Full of rah rah platitudes: happened before no worries.Then machines replaced muscle/debt low, now… https://t.co/SMvdIfmpi1
15/06/2017 12:15 PM
Recent Post Comments
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.

Print-friendly
3
JUL 13

Crisis what crisis?




What is going on in manufacturing across New Zealand? Listen to some and there is no issue; listen to others there is a crisis. Who should be listened to? What is the reality? Where is the evidence? What do the numbers say?

What we see depends a good deal on where we stand, what we hear and who we talk to, and in politics, the picture that must be painted. All sides of the discussion marshal argument and statistics to bolster their position and the observer is left to choose; one number is much like the next and if bigger is better why not choose the big number? Why not feel happy when misery is the alternative and the choice seems to carry little penalty. Be happy, don’t worry is easier than the other choice.

One element of my role is to accurately reflect the experience of our membership, a membership 100% made up of manufacturers and exporters, I look at the numbers and ask: do these accurately reflect the day to day experience of our members, if not I ask what is wrong with the numbers? I don’t look at the numbers and somehow revise the experience to fit. What you see depends on where you look, what you hear and who you listen to.

The Manufacturing Inquiry investigated a whole range of concerns, dismissing those concerns underlines the marginalisation as identified by the Inquiry. “Crisis what crisis” with both John Key and Steven Joyce quoting the May PMI results as a clear sign manufacturing is doing well, and using the number to support the denial of the problem and the Inquiry report.
The single PMI result has some validity but like any survey it is subject to sampling error bias, a single point cannot establish a trend and fundamentally the PMI does not measure real sales. Our own survey is biased to exporting manufacturers and does measure real sales across the sample. Measurements at a system level, again subject to sample bias, come from Statistics New Zealand and here we can see high level decline over the long run. At the system or supply chain level current policy settings are threatening the existence of many manufacturing export firms.

I want to look at some data series that we believe gives an accurate picture of the manufacturing sector; data that matches our day to day experience built up overtime, talking and interacting with manufacturing export firms.

According to Statistics New Zealand data, it appears that manufacturing as a percentage of GDP as well as percentage of people employed in the sector has steadily shrunk in the past 20 years. Some people see this decline is an inevitable development process, and that it can naturally be offset by an expansion in the services sector, we see this as a “post-industrial fantasy”.

If we look further into this apparent decline in manufacturing, and separate manufacturing by the level of processing; we can uncover a deeper story. In real 2003 dollars we see:

In the last decade, unprocessed and processed primary manufacturing has seen steady growth. In contrast, simply and elaborately transformed manufactures have struggled. But what does this difference mean?

This paints a picture of increasing reliance on simple, primary production and processing. Simply and elaborately transformed manufactures capture creativity and innovation to add value; ultimately providing more for the economy in the form of economic activity and highly paid, innovative jobs. This is a loss of complexity in our economy that will have negative effects on our future prosperity and quality of life. This effect can be seen in the OECD better life index, which compares various measure of quality of life between countries. New Zealand scores well in most respects, but scores only 3.3 out of a possible 10 in terms of income. This is due to our average household incomes sitting below the OECD average, as well as having relatively high income inequality.

Employment data from the March Household Labour Force Survey showed the number of people employed in manufacturing falling by nearly 11,000, year on year. These are important jobs for our economy, as jobs in the manufacturing sector have higher average and median wages than that for the economy as a whole. The loss of these jobs and output has a high flow on effect to other sectors.

Politicians structurally opposed to the Manufacturing Inquiry have said anyone claiming there is a manufacturing crisis, is really manufacturing a crisis. The fact is for those who submitted to this inquiry did so out of passion for their business and the sector, speaking from their own personal experiences, which would be foolish to dispute. It is easy to point out the odd one or two who are currently doing well, but this does nothing for those who are struggling under current policy settings.

Would it not be better to engage with the real experience? Leaning on selected numbers will only continue the indifference and push more manufacturers out of business or offshore.

How can this be positive for the future of New Zealand? 


tags: manufacturing, manufacturing inquiry, exports, politics, elaborate, elaborate manufacturing, value added
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.