RT @JoshBBornstein: 65 year study confirms my research: Tax cuts don't lead to economic growth. Ping @Nick_Xenophon , @BCAcomau https://t.…
19/08/2017 9:13 PM
RT @attn: .@Schwarzenegger has a blunt message for Nazis. https://t.co/HAbnejahtl
18/08/2017 9:38 PM
RT @PositiveMoneyUK: Make Monetary Policy Fair: It's time to explore alternatives to 'conventional' QE. https://t.co/m6CFVojm7w #QEforPeopl…
18/08/2017 9:35 PM
@deirdrekent To be expected when income is taxed and capital gain not...
16/08/2017 9:22 PM
@bernardchickey @YourHomeLoanNZ Add ring fencing loses / deal to negative gearing and we might see some balance develop in the economy.
16/08/2017 7:36 PM
@bernardchickey Or take the job and do the right thing anyway - the RBNZ is "independent" after all...
16/08/2017 7:34 PM
@bernardchickey Not take the job because you would know you would be on a hiding to nothing. The link between earn… https://t.co/nxPRuAaT6t
16/08/2017 7:31 PM
RT @theyearofelan: Sure, the cancer was aggressive. But the chemotherapy was also very aggressive. There was aggression on both sides
16/08/2017 7:27 PM
@bernardchickey DTI+LVR+OCR all needed for financial stability & inflation.RBNZ can then push back on dumb policy f… https://t.co/CqXISZUHGq
16/08/2017 7:27 PM
@SelwynPellett Farming capital gains makes it hard to pay current expenses hence the need to externalise costs. Th… https://t.co/J1yevZAHft
14/08/2017 5:46 PM
Recent Post Comments
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.

Print-friendly
2
JUN 10

Materiality, Fiscal and Monetary Policy




We have just experienced another budget that fails to demonstrate any understanding of the productive, trade exposed sector. What follows is the content of a slide I developed a while ago that tries to compare the impact of fiscal and monetary policy options on a typical firm operating in the real economy and exporting half of its annual sales.

Taking some nominal number of sales at NZ$10m, fixed assets of NZ$3m with an annual reinvestment of NZ$300k, a high 7% of sales on R&D and a pre-tax profit of 9% sales:


• 1% change in corporate tax is 1% x 9% x revenue = $9000
• 1% change in depreciation 1% of NZ$3m = $30,000
• 15% R&D tax credit = .15 x .07 x 10m = $105,000
• 1% change in exchange rate = 1% x 5m = $50,000
 

Now consider what the ranges might exist on each of these variables:


• A huge corporate tax a big change might be 5% = $45,000
• A big depreciation change to total first year write off at 28% of 300k = $84,000
• Maintain the R$D tax credit at 15% = $105,000
• A “normal” exchange rate fluctuation of 40% = $2,000,000
• Or an adverse exchange rate change of 18% can wipe out any profit.
 

On this basis is it any surprise that the real economy sees little from current policy. Equally is it any surprise that those who serve the domestic economy that are not trade exposed, don’t do R&D and have no need to invest in plant and equipment are happy with existing settings. Further is it any surprise which segment of the economy gets the investment and which does not?

Budget 2010 has further entrenched the favourable treatment of the non-trade exposed elements of our economy. As a result the trade exposed sector will continue to struggle through a long battle of attrition; the outcome will be to the detriment of everyone
 


tags: fiscal policy, monetary policy, trade exposed
I am sorry but this comment section has been disabled due to spam. My contact details are easy to find, please contact me if you want to comment or discuss anything on this blog.